Donald Trump Dials Sundar Pichai – Says Google is rigged 

Donald Trump Dials Sundar Pichai – Says Google is rigged  – In the news recently, there was the instance where the now former President of United States, Donald Trump, took time to write to the head of Google company by the name Sundar Pichai concerning his worries that Google was getting too powerful with supposed bias. This is well-reflected in Trump’s statement: “Google is rigged”, the same as two and four because it stands for a wider issue – manipulation of information and the influence of the largest technological corporations.

The background to Trump’s remarks lies in the continuing debate over the social functions of large technology giants. Some people such politicians, Democrats and Republicans inclusive have posed various alarms concerning the extensive dominance of these platforms in dissemination of information. Trump’s claims resonation on a broader tone of skepticism regarding big tech and their vested interests deeper than transparency and fairness.

Trump recall during the conversation said he was capable of perceiving that Google is evil and that its algorithms are life-threatening when it comes to free speech. He said he believes that information and its accessibility is organised and filtered on Google tend to contribute towards distortion of reality and subsequently influence opinions and even election results. This concern is not new; algorithmic bias or prejudice critique explains how algorithms can lead to prejudice either accidentally or deliberately and results in moderating dissenting voices.

Read Also – Cameron Diaz Acting Comeback: What Inspired Her Return After a Decade?

Interestingly, Trump directly wrote a letter of concern to Pichai – this is how peculiar the role of the modern tech CEOs is. Unlike the industries present a few decades back, the tech industry is somewhat restricted, and is not governed very strictly. This lack of regulation begs the question of who is to blame in the event that a company like Google is actively participating in feeding billions of its users with information they need. Skeptic critics pointed out that with no regulation, technology businesses end up focusing on revenue accumulation thereby raising question on their responsibility to the public.

Furthermore, another proof of eventually increasing political polarization in terms of technology and its influence in the democracy process – it is Trump’s terms. On the one end, the advocators of technology advancement decry that such platforms provide equal opportunities to access the information and freedom of speech. On the other hand, there are critics who argue that centralization of power with the few giant firms is actually a potential threat to democracy. Trump’s comments are exactly in line with this latter perspective, warning about the need for potential regulation necessary to properly oversee the major tech players to make sure that they are helping the public.

The potential of the discussed statements of the President of the United States of America goes beyond one conversation. They are not unique; they align with a larger cry for corporate governance particularly within the technology sector. People would think that as tech companies have such extensive control, organ systems should be put in place to address prejudices and fake news. There are demands to transform the regulations with proposals varying from antitrust measures to the explanation of algorithms.

Pichai’s answer probably had the following tone as it is usually expected from corporate managers who are not party members but are just representatives of their companies: Technology company leaders are caught between being warm and fuzzy when portraying their companies to the public and handling rational and bona fide issues underlying those platforms. The most important area I found is the conflict between creativity and compliance, which means to create technology that is both new and good in every way while not losing sight of what is ethical to do.

This kind of interaction also raises questions about the effects of tech on political process: Is This Kind of Posting a Sign of Democracy in the Age of Medium, or Does it Contribute to the Crisis of Democracy? Technology has affected the consumption of information and political information in particular they split people into a number of groups where everyone only hears the things they already believe. Media moguls and search engines like Google Interestingly have large part to play in the construction of narratives and therefore, to understand the mechanisms of giving to society information is filtering and presentation.

While Trump and other political leaders keep raising voices about the impact of the technology giants, the tech industry in turn has still to react on that. Will these corporations invest in initiatives that will make them transparent or will they just wait until someone forces them to? As we shall see, the resolution of this tension has potentially significant implications for future of both technology and politics.

In conclusion, it stands judiciously to note that Trump’s direct communication with Sundar Pichai is reflective of ascending apprehensions on part of these tech leviathans’ influence over speech. He said that “Google is rigged” This statement is part of the growing narrative of suspicion or big technology companies and it is important to emphasize the lack of justice necessary because more and more, information is controlled by algorithms. Instead, the implication is that society will have to carry on facing these challenges while the discourse on democracy and the use of technology will remain an ongoing debate, where a continuous fight has to be waged between the continuing progress of technology on the one hand and responsibility on the other.